DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37799>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37799 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-07 08:25 ------- Hi Oleg, I think this bug report is invalid. Even though run() is synchronized, it calls this.wait(...) on a regular basis and Object.wait() releases the lock on the object for the time the thread is blocked. A call to shutdown() will therefore be delayed only until the thread waits the next time. The patch does improve the code and follows the shutdown pattern suggested by JDK JavaDocs as a replacement for Thread.stop(). But does it have to go into 3.0? cheers, Roland -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
