On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 16:31 -0500, Michael Becke wrote: > Sounds reasonable to me. > > We should probably release a 3.0.1 at some point though, unless 3.1 > happens quite quickly.
No, it will not. Cookie2 alone can take a few months of development and testing. We have to be prepared to maintain a separate stable branch until 3.1 goes RC. Oleg > Perhaps we could target a 3.0.1 in a few weeks > assuming nothing else major is required. > > Mike > > On 1/30/06, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks, > > It's been a month since the 3.0 release. We have had 5 bug fixes so far. > > Some of the bugs are completely trivial. Others represent fairly > > uncommon corner cases: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt > > > > I personally believe none of these bugs warrant an emergency 3.0.1 > > release. HttpClient 3.0 overall proved reasonably stable. > > > > Therefore, I would like to branch out HttpClient 3.0 code into a > > separate development branch and start development of HttpClient 3.1 in > > the SVN trunk. HttpClient 3.0.1 can be released off the dedicated branch > > at any point of time we feel we have accumulated a considerable number > > of minor bug fixes and something fairly major has been discovered. > > > > What's the popular opinion on this? > > > > Oleg > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
