DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38624>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38624 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-12 17:57 ------- Created an attachment (id=17667) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17667&action=view) alternative 2, take 1 Again, HttpRequestExecutor has the fine grained methods needed by the asynchronous dispatchers. Here they are public to get rid of the AsyncHttpProcessor altogether. To keep the HttpRequestExecutor clean, the public fine-grained methods are confined to an inner class. I like this version better, despite the public methods. An application no longer has to create an HttpRequestExecutor and AsyncHttpProcessor for synchronous and asynchronous requests. The dispatcher uses the same HttpRequestExecutor as the application. This would allow for nice coexistence of synchronous and asynchronous processing in a single application. cheers, Roland -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
