On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 21:04 +0000, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > Can we expect any of the existing Commons [Net] committers to join the > > project if we took the Commons [Net] on board? Would they be willing to > > split the code base into a separate module per a network protocol? > > Otherwise wouldn't it be kind of silly if we had almost a dozen modules > > dedicated to various aspects of HTTP and one module containing all other > > protocols (ftp, smtp, finger, and so on)? > > My answer is 'I don't know'. As this is at the brainstorm level, I've > not yet proposed it to commons-net yet. (Think of it as offering you > guys first refusal). > > I agree with your analysis though. To work sensibly, would involve > commons-net becoming smaller units. > > Do you want me to propose the suggestion on commons-dev? >
Stephen, I am really reluctant to get ourselves dragged into yet another endless discussion on how to make inactive projects active by shuffling then around the Jakarta web site. Unless a decision can be made fast, and some _real_ people are prepared to spend _real_ hours on reorganizing Commons [Net], I believe we are much better off on our own. I am much more interested in writing and reviewing code than renaming mailing lists and migrating Bugzilla issue reports. I leave this decision to your best judgment. Cheers, Oleg > Stephen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
