On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 00:42 +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> >>3) Are we free to choose the artifact names/IDs? I would prefer
> >>   "jakarta-http-core" instead of "jakarta-httpcore". Of course
> >>   that is only because "jakarta-httpcomponents-core" is really
> >>   too long. But I think the common prefix for our components
> >>   should end with a separator char.
> >>
> > I believe we are. The problem is jakarta-http was the cause of a big
> > (and rather unpleasant) dispute with some Tomcat developers. We should
> > avoid using it in order to co-exist peacefully with the Tomcat
> > community.
> 
> Tomcat is now a TLP at Apache, so perhaps this is no longer an issue?
> 

Perhaps. I personally just do not feel like finding that out. I do not
want to get dragged into yet another squabble. We all agreed the project
was not be referred to as Jakarta Http, so we should stick to that

Oleg

> Stephen
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to