On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 01:40 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
> Hi Lars,
> 
> > Now, as far as the new architecture is concerned, is that using
> > something completely different? I suppose so looking at the different
> > project names alone (separate auth package).
> 
> Yes, it is completely different. The HttpState class will make
> it into client alpha1 (though in a different package), but I'm
> already sharpening my axe to split it in two.
> 

Folks,

I am planning to replace HttpState with two interfaces, CookieStore and
CredentialsProvider, during ALPHA2 unless someone else beats me to it.
We are going to provide default implementations of these interfaces but
users should easily be able to plug in custom implementations as well.

Oleg

> > How can we make sure we get
> > this working there too as soon as possible, since sooner or later we
> > will migrate to it as well.
> 
> I'm not sure what your interpretation of "sooner or later" is.
> We don't even have client alpha1 out of the door. HttpCore is
> currently at alpha5 with releases about every 3 to 4 months.
> You can expect the new client API to stabilize some time in 2008.
> Of course you can help us by being an early adopter and providing
> feedback on how the API can be improved. But if you have code
> that is supposed to go productive in 2007 or early 2008, then
> HttpClient 3.1 is still the preferred choice.
> 
> > Should I investigate into it and suggest (another JIRA issue I suppose)
> > or is there someone working on this and just needs to be informed so
> > that he/she can include it? Just asking.
> 
> No need for JIRA issues on this level of detail at this time.
> We are informed, thanks :-)
> 
> cheers,
>   Roland
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to