On 18/12/2007, vzs64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> (2) What makes you think this problem has anything to do with HttpClient > in the first place? There is no evidence of what so ever that the > performance degradation is due to the client side. > > IE 7.0 takes about 16 secs to download the main page > http://www.reuters.com/article/bankingfinancial-SP/idUSN2432828320070824 > (without images/js/css files), whereas HttpClient is taking the figures > mentioned in the previous post on my ASDL connection. > > HttpUrlConnection is taking 52.8 secs.
Are you sure the two methods are downloading the same amount of data? > Are there any other non-java tools against which a benchmark can be > done? (I used to use tear from microsoft earlier, but dont have the tool > now) wget is available for a lot of platforms. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Performance-Issues-with-Transfer-Encoding-chunked-tp14106574p14399806.html > Sent from the HttpClient-User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
