On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 18:42 +0000, Pete Keyes wrote:
> Are there any significant downsides to using HttpRequest.abort() to signal
> that a request should give up as soon as possible? Knowing that this is a
> blocking I/O not the apache async client. Or, is simply better to let it go
> on naturally and discard the request’s response whenever it completes?
>
> The basic pattern is
> HttpRequestBase request = ...
> Future f = executor.submit(r)
> try {
> f.get(ms, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
> }
> catch(TimeoutException e) {
> request.abort(); // <<< ?good or bad?
> throw e;
> }
>
It really depends on the average message size and how expensive it is to
set up new connections. Generally I would probably not do it for TLS/SSL
connections.
Oleg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
