Hi Mike,

> I'm sorry I didn't see your email earlier or I could have saved you
> some headaches.  Sounds like you've figured it out though.  Your
> description of the weak references, etc below is spot on and quite
> well written.

Thanks, it's good to learn that I figured it out correctly.

> Please let me know if there is anything I can add/explain.

For the time being, I'm reasonably comfortable with the code.
But I'd appreciate it very much if you could spend some time on
a code review once I'm through with the rewrite. Since you've got
the most experience with the MTHCM, you're in the best position
to spot where I might have gone into the wrong direction. Due to
the collection classes, there are plenty of downcasts. So I can't
rely on the compiler's type checks when dealing with the
replacements for the old connection interface on various levels.

cheers,
  Roland



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to