On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 18:42 +0100, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi Oleg, > Hi Roland,
> >>> myhttps1 (some custom SSL settings) -> https > >>> myhttps2 (some other custom SSL settings) -> https > >> Where would the Scheme ID (or rather name) come into play? > > > > It is necessary when sending requests through a non-transparent proxy, > > where a full request URI is required. > > I thought we were just putting the full request URL into the > request line. But that of course can't be (the only way), > because HttpClient can be used with server-relative URLs. > For those, a full URL needs to be constructed. > > I never understood where that relative URL idea came from. It is horrible hangover from the early HttpClient 2.0 BETA2 days > Should we support it in 4.0 as well, or is it one of those > strange things we'd like to get rid of? It's not hard to > implement, so this is really a question of API design. > I really would love to get rid of it. Oleg > cheers, > Roland > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
