Hi Oleg, > Will renaming xxxSocketTimeout to xxxIOTimeout be an improvement? One > way or another we need a generic means of handling connection I/O > timeouts for the client side of the 'expect: continue' handshake.
Let's leave it as it is. Otherwise we'll just have to point more users to those methods. With setSocketTimeout as the name, they'll find it themselves. cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
