On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 20:03 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > > My main issue with the build.xml is that it evolved into something that > > only one person could maintain and efficiently work with. I attempted to > > address the situation by eliminating what I saw as unnecessary > > complexity. I just could not think of this as something you might find > > offending. Anyways, I apologize for whatever action on my part that came > > across as disrespectful. It was not my intent. > > Thanks. I can see your point about the complexity. When the modules were > introduced, it was really all kept together by naming conventions. I will > create a local build process for my purposes when I find the time. > Feel free to weed out HttpClient build.xml, too. You'll understand that > I won't be throwing out the stuff I put in there myself :-) >
Roland I have spent countless hours developing and maintaining HttpClient 2.x and 3.x codelines, even though I always considered them flawed architecturally. Do you want to take a guess how much of that work will be thrown away? Oleg > cheers, > Roland > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
