Hi Oleg, > It all seems reasonable and readable. Dependencies look correct.
Good. Thanks for checking. > I might > add that the option to make informal modules formal is still not off the > table and the decision is still pending. Ack. It's in the "Levels of Grouping" section: > It is still up for discussion which of the informal units should > become modules. cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
