On 27.10.2007, at 18:50, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 09:37 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eric,
Just use a branch?
I don't think there is a need for branching yet.
The code affected is mostly stable, and Oleg can
prepare a patch to show his ideas. It's also easier
for me to review a single patch without having to
diff branches.
Roland,
I think Erik has a point. I'll create a separate branch for this
unit of
work so I could commit intermediate results, which you could take
cursory look at if you wish to. I'll generate a unified patch against
trunk once I am done for a proper review.
Yep, that's what I meant; it's just easier for development, keeps
history while incrementally working on it, keeps the other peers in
the loop and can easily be diffed against trunk etc.
In httpd-land we're usually using unversioned names (like foo-dev or
foo-refactor, unfortunately not all are consistent) to distinguish
from "real", version-based branches; see here for an example:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/
I believe some other projects are even using separate sub-dirs like
e.g. /branches/dev/... or just /sandbox/... to keep them separate.
Cheers,
Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
