On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 22:07 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi folks, > > against all odds, I've found a few minutes to draft a TLP proposal > based on the consensus we reached during the discussion. I put it > in the Jakarta Wiki, to keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the loop: > > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/TLPHttpComponents >
Hi Roalnd It actually looks pretty decent to me. Great job! > The style is a mixture of the previous proposal based on the > Jakarta template, and the TLP examples linked from the Incubator > pages. I guess at the current level of Jakarta activity, the > Incubator is the better reference. > The phrasing is terrible. Is that style of endless worm sentences > actually mandatory, or is it just a convention nobody every cared > to contest? The language is ugly indeed, but there is no point in contesting it. Let's get this whole thing over with and go back to coding. > I've highlighted the important parts so you don't > have to read through all the formalism around it. > > In the scope description, I've dropped the "transport aspects" > qualifier. That was mainly an editorial decision, since I couldn't > find a way to disambiguate the phrase without creating an even > worse word snake: > > ...the transport aspects of HTTP and related protocols > ( ) <= intented reading > likely reading => ( ) > > > Please let me know what you think, and/or edit the wiki directly. > I suggest to wait with putting in our names until the proposal > itself has been reviewed. > The draft looks good to me. A big +1 and may thanks for taking care of this chore from me. Cheers Oleg > cheers, > Roland > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
