As a user of HTTPNIO I'd like to see HTTPNIO-on-MINA because I can naturally see some people wanting to have all NIO comms going via MINA, and some other transports we are looking at in Synapse are based on MINA. But given that Apache is a "do-ocracy" and my Non-Blocking coding skills are minimal I think I will shut up now!
Paul On Nov 23, 2007 5:52 AM, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Roland, > > Thanks for the response. Let's wait and see how people think about > this issue. Probably Jeff will also have something to say. :) > > Cheers, > Trustin > > On Nov 23, 2007 3:06 AM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Trustin, > > > > re-inventing the wheel is never a good thing. To me, it sounds > > reasonable that HttpComponents and MINA cooperate on the client > > side, at least for the higher level functionality. There is of > > course some kind of competition on the lower levels, where > > HttpNIO and MINA address similar functionality. IIRC, Oleg had > > slightly different design goals for HttpNIO. At the same time, > > he made sure that MINA can be used to implement the HttpNIO API. > > So yes, I can see potential for joined efforts: higher-level > > client functionality like HttpAuth and HttpCookie, and also > > a low-level component HttpNIO-on-MINA. > > > > But since Java NIO is not within my sphere of interest, > > I have to leave it to others to figure this out (or not). > > > > cheers, > > Roland > > > > > > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > -- > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
