Hello Stefan,
On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 18:46:38 +1000, Stefan Peter <[email protected]>
wrote:
[snip]
So my conclusion is that something in the libboost implementation of
optional has changed between 1.58 and 1.60. And lo and behold, in the
release notes of boost 1.60 [1] you can find:
Optional:
Changed the implementation of boost::none again. Now it is a const
object with internal linkage (as any other tag). This fixes #11203.
So, this may be the root issue. How to fix this, however, is beyond my
pay grade.
Thanks Stefan, I think that explains the cause of the issue. I should have
looked a bit more.
I guess the solution is probably going to mean checking the version of
boost and compiling accordingly.
I guess that's up to Chris and Thomas, as it's also beyond my grade...I
don't even get paid anymore :-)
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~hugin-bug-hunters
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~hugin-bug-hunters
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
