Erik Krause wrote: > enblend uses a not so optimal number of levels. specify -l 20 at the > enblend command line to increase the number to the maximum and you > get results similar to smartblend. enblend 3 should be almost as fast > as smartblend BTW...
Enfuse used to employ exactly one level less than the maximum allowed number of levels given a particular kernel and image size. This issue has been fixed in CVS on 2008-09-13T21:15:02. Please let me know if any problem related to the levels calculation persists and I have to rework my patch. Concerning the performance of Enfuse-3.2: Contrast weighting is _much_ faster because of the new, O(1) algorithm. Saturation weighting could have become slightly faster, too. /Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
