I noticed the same kind of effect when trying to do non panorama HDR with vignetting correction enabled. Did you tried without the vignetting correction?
esby / Y. Tennevin icysubdweller wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone could give me a couple pointers on using > Enfuse. I decided to try it for the first time today, and you can see > what happened by looking at the file "enfuse_fairy_ring.jpg" that I've > uploaded. > > I put my camera on a tripod in my living room and was shooting towards > the window in natural light. I metered a proper exposure on the back > of the couch at 2.5 secs at f5.6. Up in the top left corner of the > window (sky with branches) the meter said 1/1600th sec at f5.6. It's > a total difference of 10 EV. I snapped 5 pictures, spaced somewhat > unevenly through that exposure range. When I blended them with Hugin, > I went ahead and used autopano-sift-C to generate a few control points > between the images (max of 8 points between each pair of images), and > after that, I added a few other control points myself where I thought > they might be useful. > > Then I stitched the images with the following process: > 1. On the Optimizer tab, I just clicked the "Optimize Now" button > with whatever was the default. It reported good alignment between all > the images with average distance of 0.15 pixels. > 2. On the Exposure tab, I selected the "High dynamic range, fixed > exposure" option on the menu and clicked "Optimize Now." It reported > what seemed like a large number (in the 25 range), but I didn't know > what to expect, so I ignored that and went on. > 3. On the Stitcher tab, I pressed the Calculate the Field of View and > Optimal Size buttons. Then under Exposure Blending, I selected only > the "Blended panorama (enfuse)" option... it was the only one of the > boxes selected, nothing under Normal or Merge to HDR... and in File > Formats area, I set both the Normal and HDR settings to TIFF. Then I > clicked "Stitch Now." > > And you see the result in the file "enfuse_fairy_ring.jpg". > > So... can anybody tell me what likely went wrong that produced that > mondo bizarre artifact? Is 10 EV just too wide an exposure range to > expect good results from enfuse? Is my method incorrect? Do I even > need control points to use enfuse, or does Hugin just ignore them? > Or, even if Hugin doesn't ignore them, can I skip that step and JUST > use enfuse and forget about perspective correction? Do I need to > select different options for the Optimizer, Exposure, or Stitcher tabs > to get the best results? > > Thanks for any help you can give me! > Rodney > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
