On Dec 14, 5:01 pm, Erik Krause <erik.kra...@gmx.de> wrote: > Bart.van.Andel wrote: > > Well, I have an example here which consists of two images with almost > > 50 percent overlap. The source resolution is 2576 pixels wide, and > > Hugin suggests an optimum of 5055 pixels (rectilinear projection). > > Although it need a little cropping, this resolution is too wide to > > prevent pixels from being upscaled. > > This depends on the angle of view. Rectilinear output is same resolution > only in the image center and needs to be stretched outside. Only if you > restrict output hFoV to the hFoV of a single input image you can compare > the values.
The case you describe is a pretty obvious case. A single picture taken with a "rectilinear lens" will remain the same when using a rectilinear projection. My point is, how does Hugin determine this estimate for a multiple image panorama? To give Ralf a nice answer as to why the estimate wasn't correct, this would really help (together with the other information I requested). Ralf, maybe you could upload your source images (jpg will do) and .pto somewhere? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
