so we have two preview windows: fast and traditional. Do we need both of them for 0.8.0 and if yes which one should be the main one and how do we attract user attention to the second one?
my impression is that currently we can not simply get rid of the traditional preview. - the traditional preview has an option to show LDR/HDR which the fast does not have - fast preview sometimes has artefacts (e.g. at the 360° seam of equirectangular input) and sometimes does not display properly - has anybody tested fast preview extensively, e.g. on gigapixel projects that have been stitched before with the traditional preview? also it would be good to bring to the preview pane those settings affecting the preview that are currently in the Stitcher tab, i.e. panorama, field of view, canvas size and crop. given all the above, would it be an idea to: - make the panorama preview into a simple tab, like any other tab - on that tab, there would be a switch to choose between the fast and the normal preview - on that tab, the user would manipulate those parameters that affects how the output looks like, i.e. the projection, FOV, canvas size, crop - on the stitching tab, only the second half would stay (output/processing/file formats) - the preview tab would fit between the exposure tab and the stitcher tab Yuv --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
