Hi Seth,

Sorry.

you are completely right. I read the comment and saw the hash mark and
jumped too fast to conclusions.
I'll have a look again this weekend.

Harry

2009/4/16 Seth Berrier <seth.berr...@gmail.com>

> Are you sure?
>
> In C/C++ lines are commented out only with '//' or with '/* ... */'.
>
> Statements pre-pended with a '#' are preprocessor directives.  You have
> things like:
>
> #include
> #define
> #ifdef
> #else
> #endif
> #pragma
>
> and many others, including:
>
> #undef
>
> '#undef XXX'  will undefine the preprocessor macro 'XXX' if it is defined (
> http://www.cppreference.com/wiki/preprocessor/undef).
>
> As it stands right now, lm.h will always undefine 'HAVE_LAPACK'.  I assume
> in the original distribution of LevMar this line looked like this:
>
> //#undef HAVE_LAPACK // uncomment this to force not using LAPACK
>
> With the extra '//' at the beginning.  For whatever reason, it has already
> been uncommented in the hugin-levmar version forcing levmar to not use
> LAPACK no matter what.  Aside: we might want to ask why ... this seems
> intentional and perhaps those who understand the math better than we had
> good reasons.
>
> For fun, I went ahead and removed this on my system and added the line
> '#define HAVE_LAPACK' just below it (just a hack).  The system compiled
> happily (since there are links to LAPACK in /usr on OS X) but I haven't
> tried to run Hugin just yet to see if it really has everything it needs for
> LAPACK.
>
> Note: I think '#' is used for comments in shell scripts and the like but
> not in C/C++.
>
> Seth
>
> P.S.  Sorry for hijacking your thread RickyRicky.  None of this is much
> help for your problem I'm afraid.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Harry van der Wolf <hvdw...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Seth,
>>
>> thanks for looking into it.
>>
>> However, your statement that lm.h undefines it, is not correct.
>> the line is:
>>
>> #undef HAVE_LAPACK // uncomment this to force not using LAPACK
>>
>> As soon as you remove the # it will be an undef statement. Currently it is
>> only a remark, so currently it will use lapack provided it can be found.
>>
>> Hoi,
>> Harry
>>
>>
>> 2009/4/16 Seth Berrier <seth.berr...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Okay, it looks like LevMar (the Levenburg-Marquardt (sp) library) is
>>> what's looking for LAPACK.  It uses the preprocesser define 'HAVE_LAPACK' to
>>> indicate that it is available.
>>>
>>> If you look in 'lm.h' the code specifically UN-defines HAVE_LAPACK so
>>> even if you were to define it, this line would defeat your define (very odd
>>> choice).  So, perhaps this might be doing it.  You just need to go into lm.h
>>> and comment out line 23.
>>>
>>> Of course, this by itself won't fix the problem.  You need to find LAPACK
>>> on the drive and provide the library paths and header paths to cmake but it
>>> sounds like you have that going already.  If you can find them then you just
>>> need to add -DHAVE_LAPACK to the compiler flags for the libhuginlevmar.a
>>> target and comment out that line in lm.h.
>>>
>>> Hope that helps.
>>> Seth
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Seth Berrier <seth.berr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll take a look.  No idea if I can help but it sounds like something I
>>>> might be able to figure out.
>>>>
>>>> Seth
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Harry van der Wolf 
>>>> <hvdw...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lapack is simply not correctly detected in hugin (actually in levmar).
>>>>> I dug a little deeper and the routines to correctly detect BLAS and Lapack
>>>>> are simply not there. Lapack and BLAS are available via the Accelerate
>>>>> framework and via the vecLib framework on MacOSx. To maintain 
>>>>> compatibility
>>>>> they are even linked to in /usr/lib.
>>>>> To test I also built hugin on Ubuntu with lapack (BLAS) installed (libs
>>>>> and dev) and also there it is not detected.
>>>>> I already tried to implement the FindBLAS.cmake and FindLapack.cmake
>>>>> modules to detect it correctly but can't make it work (yet?). I know I'm 
>>>>> on
>>>>> the correct route but I simply lack the programming skills to make it a
>>>>> success. I'm a builder, not a programmer.
>>>>>
>>>>> The warnings you get when compiling via cmake is what everyone gets on
>>>>> every platform (as far as I can tell now). I can only say that all my 
>>>>> builds
>>>>> are also always using LU instead of Lapack/BLAS.
>>>>> I will try to get it working but if I can't get it to work very soon, I
>>>>> will simply file a bug and hope a programmer can take a look.
>>>>>
>>>>> Harry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/4/15 RickyRicky <meles...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Harry,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I do not have vigra or jhead installed as a part of MacPorts...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BigDaddy:Application meleschi$ port installed | grep -i vigra
>>>>>> BigDaddy:Application meleschi$ port installed | grep -i jhead
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks...  Anything else I can check?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ricardo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 13, 1:29 pm, Harry van der Wolf <hvdw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi Ricardo,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Did you install vigra and/or jhead via MacPorts for some reason? If
>>>>>> you did,
>>>>>> > please deactivate them (sudo port deactivate vigra; sudo port
>>>>>> deactivate
>>>>>> > jhead) and reconfigure and recompile Hugin.
>>>>>> > If the configure script finds vigra "outside"  hugin it will use
>>>>>> that one.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > You can find installed packages by running "port installed" or "port
>>>>>> > installed | grep <package>".
>>>>>> > The deactivate command will not uninstall the packages. It will only
>>>>>> remove
>>>>>> > them from the install libraries. If you want them back you can
>>>>>> simply use
>>>>>> > "sudo port activate <package>".
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Hoi,
>>>>>> > Harry
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 2009/4/13 RickyRicky <meles...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>  >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Hey Seth,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Thanks for the tip on running Hugin from the command line.  I did
>>>>>> so,
>>>>>> > > and here are the lines before the big crash.  I hope someone can
>>>>>> > > recognize my problem!:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Determining placement of the images: 53%
>>>>>> > > Number of images 2
>>>>>> > > Hugin(77452,0xa06cd830) malloc: *** error for object 0x2a2c200:
>>>>>> double
>>>>>> > > free
>>>>>> > > *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
>>>>>> > > Optimizing Variables
>>>>>> > > Strategy 1
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 0 iteration(s):          801.152704448697 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 1
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 1 iteration(s):          801.019725960169 units
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Optimizing Variables
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 0 iteration(s):          57.1154776303789 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 1 iteration(s):          56.9698889445181 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 2 iteration(s):          8.60724772529945 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 3 iteration(s):          7.72758159217231 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 4 iteration(s):          6.58494386005708 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 5 iteration(s):          5.40204786941155 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 6 iteration(s):          3.79597859019421 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 7 iteration(s):          1.66872838105291 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 8 iteration(s):         0.479946564550839 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 9 iteration(s):         0.479481987047642 units
>>>>>> > > Strategy 2
>>>>>> > > Average (rms) distance between Controlpoints
>>>>>> > > after 10 iteration(s):         0.479481986986529 units
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Bus error
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Thanks,
>>>>>> > > Ricardo Meleschi
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > On Apr 13, 10:58 am, Seth Berrier <seth.berr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > > > Hmm, well I got this compiler problem while compiling on my
>>>>>> MacBook
>>>>>> > > > (incidentally, I didn't think 10.5 would run on powerpc arch
>>>>>> anymore,
>>>>>> > > glad
>>>>>> > > > to know).  However, I ignored the error message and things still
>>>>>> seem to
>>>>>> > > > work okay for me.  The Hugin.app and all the supporting
>>>>>> applications are
>>>>>> > > > built and installed correctly.  I had to monkey with the path
>>>>>> setting a
>>>>>> > > > little bit.  For that, you can check out this
>>>>>> > > > thread<
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/3efbca4..
>>>>>> .>.
>>>>>> > > > However, the path problem will come up when you do auto control
>>>>>> point
>>>>>> > > > detection or with the final stitch as this is when external
>>>>>> programs are
>>>>>> > > > used.  I don't think this woulod cause problems at position
>>>>>> optimization.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > My best advice would be to run hugin from the terminal shell
>>>>>> (just run
>>>>>> > > <path
>>>>>> > > > to hugin.app>/Hugin.app/Contents/MacOS/Hugin)  You might get
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> > > messages
>>>>>> > > > from the terminal output.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > Seth
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:34 AM, RickyRicky <meles...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > Gents,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > I've been working on compiling Hugin these last few days and
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> > > > > succeeded in getting it compiled, but for some reason whenever
>>>>>> I run
>>>>>> > > > > Hugin and attempt to align images, hugin always crashes when
>>>>>> > > > > determining placement of the image, after Celeste is run.  I
>>>>>> don't see
>>>>>> > > > > a log file being generated anywhere.  I'm not too familiar
>>>>>> with Hugin
>>>>>> > > > > so I may be looking in the wrong places.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > When I review my compile log, I see I was having problems with
>>>>>> LAPACK:
>>>>>> > > > > -----------
>>>>>> > > > > [  3%] Building CXX object
>>>>>> src/foreign/jhead/CMakeFiles/huginjhead.dir/
>>>>>> > > > > exif.o
>>>>>> > > > > In file included from
>>>>>> /Users/meleschi/src/hugin/src/foreign/levmar/
>>>>>> > > > > misc.c:42:
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> /Users/meleschi/src/hugin/src/foreign/levmar/misc_core.c:562:2:
>>>>>> > > > > warning: #warning LAPACK not available, LU will be used for
>>>>>> matrix
>>>>>> > > > > inversion when computing the covariance; this might be
>>>>>> unstable at
>>>>>> > > > > times
>>>>>> > > > > In file included from
>>>>>> /Users/meleschi/src/hugin/src/foreign/levmar/
>>>>>> > > > > misc.c:57:
>>>>>> > > > >
>>>>>> /Users/meleschi/src/hugin/src/foreign/levmar/misc_core.c:562:2:
>>>>>> > > > > warning: #warning LAPACK not available, LU will be used for
>>>>>> matrix
>>>>>> > > > > inversion when computing the covariance; this might be
>>>>>> unstable at
>>>>>> > > > > times
>>>>>> > > > > [  3%] Building C object
>>>>>> src/foreign/levmar/CMakeFiles/huginlevmar.dir/
>>>>>> > > > > lmlec.o
>>>>>> > > > > /Users/meleschi/src/hugin/src/foreign/levmar/lmlec.c:39:2:
>>>>>> warning:
>>>>>> > > > > #warning Linearly constrained optimization requires LAPACK and
>>>>>> was not
>>>>>> > > > > compiled!
>>>>>> > > > > -------------
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > I've searched on the above problem but haven't found exact
>>>>>> > > > > instructions as to how to resolve it.  The closest I've found
>>>>>> is this:
>>>>>> > > > > -----
>>>>>> > > > > I had the same problem with Xcode with OS 10.5. In OS 10.5
>>>>>> LAPACK is
>>>>>> > > > > part of the Accelerate framework.
>>>>>> > > > > I put this into the project options
>>>>>> > > > > OTHER_LDFLAGS = "-framework Accelerate"
>>>>>> > > > > I'm not sure if this is the correct syntax but it did get rid
>>>>>> of the
>>>>>> > > > > LAPACK warnings.
>>>>>> > > > > ----
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > Where exactly do I put the OTHER_LDFLAG option?  I've tried
>>>>>> multiple
>>>>>> > > > > places with no joy.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > I'm running 12 GB of ram on a Dual 2 GHz PowerPC G5 with OSX
>>>>>> 10.5.6
>>>>>> > > > > fully patched.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > The svn revision is 3784.  I did follow the instructions on
>>>>>> > > > >http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_OSX.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > Here's the info on the ports I have installed...
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > BigDaddy:Application meleschi$ sudo port info boost tiff jpeg
>>>>>> libpng
>>>>>> > > > > wxWidgets subversion openexr exiv2 glew
>>>>>> > > > > boost @1.38.0 (devel)
>>>>>> > > > > Variants:    darwin, darwin_9, debug, docs, graphml, icu,
>>>>>> openmpi,
>>>>>> > > > > python24, python25, python26, st
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > --
>>>>>> > > > > tiff @3.8.2, Revision 3 (graphics)
>>>>>> > > > > Variants:    macosx, universal
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > --
>>>>>> > > > > jpeg @6b, Revision 3 (graphics)
>>>>>> > > > > Variants:    universal
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > --
>>>>>> > > > > libpng @1.2.35 (graphics)
>>>>>> > > > > Variants:    universal
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > --
>>>>>> > > > > wxWidgets @2.8.10 (graphics, devel)
>>>>>> > > > > Variants:    debug, nonmonolithic, universal
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > --
>>>>>> > > > > subversion @1.6.1 (devel)
>>>>>> > > > > Variants:    bash_completion, darwin_7, disable_keychain,
>>>>>> > > > > mac_os_x_server_mod_dav_svn, mod_dav_svn, no_bdb, no_neon,
>>>>>> tools,
>>>>>> > > > > unicode_path
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > --
>>>>>> > > > > openexr @1.6.1, Revision 1 (graphics)
>>>>>> > > > > Variants:    universal
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > --
>>>>>> > > > > exiv2 @0.18.1 (graphics)
>>>>>> > > > > Variants:    universal
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > --
>>>>>> > > > > glew @1.5.1, Revision 1 (graphics, devel)
>>>>>> > > > > Variants:    universal
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > > Thanks for any help!
>>>>>> > > > > Ricardo
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > > --
>>>>>> > > > seth.berr...@gmail.com
>>>>>> > > > Graduate Research Assistant
>>>>>> > > > University of Minnesota
>>>>>> > > > Digital Technology Center
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> seth.berr...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Graduate Research Assistant
>>>> University of Minnesota
>>>> Digital Technology Center
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> seth.berr...@gmail.com
>>> Graduate Research Assistant
>>> University of Minnesota
>>> Digital Technology Center
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> seth.berr...@gmail.com
> Graduate Research Assistant
> University of Minnesota
> Digital Technology Center
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to