On Dec 4, 3:31 pm, Ben Page <wheresmyl...@gmail.com> wrote: > gah > I have an ability to miss the obvious. In the mean time, I found > Flexify by Flaming Pear and it worked incredibly well. > It actually worked a little better then Hugin did, but that could have > just been an issue with that picture in the first place. > > When you "guys" (I get the impression theres a decent sized group > here) take panoramas and combine them, what setting to you use to make > sure the panorama is as accurate as possible? I have "Number of > Control Points per Overlap" at 1300, and I have "Rotation Search" > enabled, but in the Flickr guide there was another option, I think it > was called Keypoint, and I haven't seen that.
i've never heard of or used 'keypoint' before. not sure what it is. 1300 points per overlap is excessive (imo). i have hugin set to use only 10 points per overlap. after running celeste and clean cp's, i optimize for position, ypr, ypr&v and i typically add barrel (b) in for good measure. that gives me a good baseline for the pano to get things started, then its usually off to masking, manually adding the nadir and a few more runs/stitches to get a final version of the pano. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
