Am 22.01.2010 07:42, schrieb cspiel:
If you only look at the quality of the generated seams, (almost) nothing has changed between Enblend 3.2 and 4.0. So, Smartblend should still be superior in this department.
In other words: One can not recommend enblend 4. Seam line optimization hasn't improved. Blending sky still renders uneven results where smartblend creates evenly looking sky and blending across zenith and nadir is still not possible (despite anyone who reads "--wrap=both" must assume it would).
And there is this annoying new error "excessive overlap detected; remove one of the images" which sometimes causes enblend to stop blending panoramas with multiple images in the same location (which gave a warning in enblend 3).
-- Erik Krause http://www.erik-krause.de -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
