On May 22, 5:08 pm, James Legg <lankyle...@gmail.com> wrote: > If the only difference is the number of pixels in the frame, then more > megapixels input should give more megapixels optimal size for output. It > is supposed to scale to the pixel density of the centre of the output. > > Since you are using different cameras, you could also be varying > something else which affects the resolution. The field of view of the > camera, the amount of overlap between the images, the field of view of > the output, and the output projection type could all affect the optimal > size too. Are these similar between your panoramas?
I hadn't thought of that .. the vFOV is indeed quite different between the two [the 8Mp camera is about 52 degrees at its widest, while the 10Mp was almost 70]. That explains that. Thanks. :) -Derek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
