thank you all for your answers.. using the james' suggestion, i scaled down the images to a 40% of the original size.. with these new images hugin worked really well and enough fast!
so, going on, i produced an equirectangular image, and i noticed that when shooting the images i missed some sky above, but that i shooted fine all the pavement behind me.. it didn't matter about the hole in the sky, so i imported my equirectangular image in a program to convert it to a VR movie (CubicConverter).. unfortunely this program automatically recognize my image as a cylindrical picture with a field of view of only 114°.. for this reason (i guess) it creates a video VR with two holes, one in the sky (as expected) but also on the pavement, even if the picture cover the whole space (indeed the bottom cube face is really distorted).. how can i solve all this? i hope i have been clear enough.. i am just practicing with these techniques, and i'm using some photos i shooted to try.. if i wasn't enough clear with my explanation i can post you some image to clarify.. :) thanks again DNL On May 25, 11:05 am, paul womack <pwom...@papermule.co.uk> wrote: > dex Otaku wrote: > > On May 24, 4:00 pm, sneike <dnl.sne...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> so, here i am again.. > >> today i tried with the 64 bit version, using the same high res images > >> as before.. > >> this time my Mac didn't completely freeze, but after one hour and half > >> it was still running the enblend process loading the image 16 (of 36), > >> and it was getting always slower.. > > >> maybe the only chance is to reduce the input sizes.. :( > > > This sounds like about the performance I'd expect doing a fairly large > > pano with fairly large images. > > Yes - the maths behind all this is hard enough that > getting the maths right is a significant task. > > Compounding the difficulty by having good > memory practices has been a low priority > for the coders of the various components. > > (essentially, all the algorithms need an extra > level of tiling, so that good memory > locality is achived. This then "plays nice" > with both explicit tiling based caches, > and virtual memory systems.) > > BugBear > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available > at:http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
