On 13 Okt., 18:36, Bernd Hohmann <hohm...@harddiskcafe.de> wrote: > On 13.10.2010 11:54, kfj wrote:
> Reverting to full frame fisheye and reoptimizing v+a,b,c created fine > output. > If you just use 6 around and sky, you cannot expect to generate reliable a, b and c data. They will depend on your (insufficiently distributed) CPs, and the optimizer tries to make the best of it. You must calibrate the lens with data which are fit for a calibration - 20-30 shots, static scene, indoor, ceiling and wall content, panorama head - these a.b.c and v values you can use for an actual landscape 6+2 take (do make a nadir shot as well). Only reoptimize for v,d,e and NOT for a,b,c with the 6+2 landscape. If you don't have reliable calibration data, it's better to work with a=b=c set to 0 or try to use someone else's data, but you need the stereographic setting. > At least for my outdoor landscape (means: ground , horizon, sky) 360° > panoramas. > I do it all the time, landscapes with the Samyang 8mm 6 around 1 up 1 down, I know it works. with regards KFJ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
