If Hugin is not retaining the profile information, it should be more
of an irritation rather than a significant problem. Just do all your
work as usual while ignoring any "funny" colors. When you have
created a final output file, just open it in your favorite image
editor and assign the it the correct profile.
That is, probably the PIXEL data has not changed, only the notation of
what profile is being used.
eo
On Nov 9, 2010, at 5:40 PM, sneike wrote:
so, is there a solution to use images with a certain profile, having
as output an image with that same profile?
On Nov 10, 12:26 am, Bruno Postle <br...@postle.net> wrote:
On Tue 09-Nov-2010 at 11:56 +0100, Carl von Einem wrote:
Eric O'Brien wrote:
I wonder if the inputs have multiple profiles, and hugin is
arbitrarily
picking ONE for the output.
It certainly does this, or is supposed to. i.e. it treats the input
and output data as unprofiled, then copies any profile from the
first photo to the final output.
It could be modified to convert all photos to a universal
colourspace on reading and to a specified colourspace when writing,
but there has never been any request for this.
I consistently have to reassign the correct profile to the output
file (using Harry's Mac OS X builds). Isn't exiftool supposed to do
this job?
I have never tested it, it could be broken.
--
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
