David Haberthür kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, 27. heinäkuuta 2011): > On 26.07.2011, at 21:51, Tom Sharpless wrote: > > Like it says. Exiftool can greatly increase stitching time, > > because it makes a full-size temporary copy of the pano, > > which typically involves de-compressing and re-compressing > > the whole thing. But for me there is no payoff -- I > > really don't need camera settings in my panos, and I don't > > need a CIE profile either, as I always have to convert from > > Adobe RGB to sRGB by hand anyhow. I would rather be able > > to stitch a few more panos per week. I suspect I am not > > alone. > > I very much like that the Geotags and Camera settings are > copied over from my original photos to the resulting pano, > please don't take that away! But as I see you're aiming to > provide an option in the preference tab, so I'm just going to > keep it set to "use exiftool" all the time.
ICC profiles in the intermediate images are required to use the -c (CIECAM blending) option in enblend/enfuse. Using exiftool to copy metadata is a kludge, I think each program in the processing pipeline should handle the metadata in accordance of the MWG guidelines: http://www.metadataworkinggroup.org/specs/ That would avoid the extra copying and slowdown caused by exiftool. -- Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@iki.fi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
