Jeffrey Martin wrote:
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 11:05:41 AM UTC+2, kfj wrote:
On 27 Jul., 09:28, Jeffrey Martin <360c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Personally i've had the best results using +1.5 and -0.5 exposure
derived
> from a single raw file.
Differently processed single raw files are perfect source material -
if the scene can be captured with the dynamic range available. I don't
know what you have, but my sensor's dynamic range is somewhere in the
12 to 14 bit range, and my landscapes sometimes just don't fit into
that. I wish they would.
careful of histogram on canon - it is a histogram from the jpeg, even
when shooting raw. what is overexposed is not really. so you can push it
another stop or more. on my 550D i can push it up to 2 stops more and
recover highlights that it says are totally blown.
Get to know the CCD chip in your camera. I don't know which CCD Canon
uses. In my Maxxum 7D, the CCD easily blows highlights.
--
Gnome Nomad
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://www.cafepress.com/otherend/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
