> TGA may be nice compression wise, but I don't think this format is as > widely known as TIFF or PNG, so I'd opt for using the latter. Note that > this is pretty straightforward when using (for example) the freeimage > library (as opposed to using functions from libtiff or libjpeg directly). >
It's all coded up now - I've gone for PNG as TGA can only give you up to 1/256 compression, and as you say it is more widely known. -lpng will be a requirement for the next version (just waiting on some test files for a TIFF variant). David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
