Yes, you can. Technically. However, you'll need extreme accuracy in all that mechanical data. It's not impossible to get that kind of mechanical accuracy but it is very hard and probably harder than you think. I shoot with a fisheye on a pano head and still require control points and fine tuning to get acceptable results.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Andrew Baddeley < andrew.badde...@nctechimaging.com> wrote: > Would I be right in assuming that if you provide HUGIN with a set of > fisheye images where you know the precise yaw, pitch, tilt, fov, focal > length of each lens and the a, b, c, d, e individual lens parameters - you > can in fact process those images without requiring control points? > > AB > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
