The LZW compression algorithm is lossless, so you are not losing any information by using it rather than uncompressed TIFFs. In my experience, compressed TIFFs are longer to process. So that I use compressed TIFFs only for storage, not for working. This of course may depend on the software you use. And maybe I should check again, the situation could have changed.
2013/2/5 Gnome Nomad <gnomeno...@gmail.com> > Depends on what you intend to do with them. I prefer keeping my master > images in 16-bit LZW compressed TIFF, and provide other depths/formats if > needed. > > On 02/04/2013 10:58 PM, MaTa wrote: > >> Hello >> >> Please I need you help. I always export my photos from Lighthoom as TIFF >> 16bits, LZW compressed at full resolution/size. It's the best way? >> >> I hope to keep these image quality (resolution/size and 16bits) at the >> entire process. >> >> Thanks in advance >> Oriol >> > > -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
