Pawel Rozenek wrote:
Thank you anyone who decided to say something in my post.
The L bracket is made from 10 mm thic aluminium, plate plate is 4mm thick and
please believe me that the maximum fluctuation is +/-2 2 mm so in MY opinion
with 14mm focal length is nothing (am I wrong?)
The head ball... Hm.. It is a better point. Of course I always try to adjust it
as horizontal as possible which is not very easy and not accurate. However
please DO NOT forget that once the head ball is locked, then I can rotate it
perfectly in one axis. The ball head is locked forever when I do panoramas,
only horizontal plate rotates - which maight be not always in perfwectly
horizontal orientation, because of the ball head. So in the worst case all
frames are not exactly vertical/horizontal,
however all are equal.
Is any chance that makes my problem?
If not, I am still wondering if there is a chance to use better hugin settings
even if it takes more time.
The obvious test is to carefully place a large number of fine-tuned control
point by
hand (No automatic points at all), on a test set, then optimize.
This will confirm or deny that your nodal setting is perfect.
BugBear
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/532AB0D6.1020103%40papermule.co.uk.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
