Hallöchen! FabKzo writes:
> I'm not a dev, but does this mean that having a 29.42 mm instead > of 28mm, for example, would be the result? So all calculus to find > Hfov from there should be bad? AFAIKS, everything is fine. Hugin's calculations are precise. The only issue is that Hugin defines a focal length different from the one that an optics textbook would define, that's all. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: [email protected] or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/874n2asidf.fsf%40physik.rwth-aachen.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
