On Monday, 20 June 2016 at 8:10:33 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2016-06-20 1:21 GMT+02:00 Greg 'groggy' Lehey <groog...@gmail.com>: > >> On Sunday, 19 June 2016 at 11:14:08 -0700, Gloom Demon wrote: >>> >>> Does Photoshop make them better? > > Also, I wonder if the answer wouldn't depend on how the panorama was > taken. Photoshop might be better at hiding glitches in a panorama > taken without a pano head, for example. So if someone ever does > tests, testing different scenarios would make the test more > meaningful.
Based on reports I heard about earlier versions, this is an area where Photoshop was weak. But as I said, a comparison would be good, and if there are areas where Photoshop is better, it would be clearly something to address in Hugin. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger g...@freebsd.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20160620070557.GC21546%40eureka.lemis.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
