On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 09:55:15 +1100, Gnome Nomad <gnomeno...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Oh, I agree that enblend 4.2 should support compression=none since 4.1
supported it. Sounds like a regression in enblend. Is there a bug report
on
it?
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016, 12:15 Stefan Peter <s_pe...@swissonline.ch> wrote:
On 03.11.2016 19:11, Gnome Nomad wrote:
Hmm, TIFF uses lossless compression. So why are you wanting to use no
compression?
This should not be the question. If an option is presented, this option
should be usable.
So, either enblend _can_ and _will_ do uncompressed tif output in this
case, or it should bail out with an error message indicating the reason
why this option is invalid in the current situation.
But just doing something different then the user has requested
definitely is not ok.
Can we have a closer look at this issue? I definitely will do so for the
Ubuntu packages I maintain in the next couple of days.
I see Thomas has made a fix a few hours ago...
Changeset: 1488 (882d3ccba621) Fixes handling of uncompressed output file …
this might have fixed the problem, not sure, I haven't tested.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.yqdj8m0lrs0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
