There is/was a command line switch to enable DEFLATE, but for some reason it's commented out in the source code and I didn't leave myself a note to tell me why.
As for enblend, it's hard to say whether it's a bug, but it might be. Enblend produces different outputs if you supply images in a different order - one reason I wrote multiblend - but I think that's more like a slightly unsatisfactory compromise than a bug. On Sunday, 27 August 2017 00:59:27 UTC+1, B. Schnieders wrote: > > Hrrmmm, I'm in a committed long-term relationship with enblend, but seeing > that it can't fulfil my needs right now, I had a quick flirt with > multiblend.... works! Most of the images have good overlap and no > parallax/moving objects anyway, so hardly any blending was necessary. > > Interesting. Was just about to write that re-ordering didn't work, but > wasn't sure if I tried all combinations. Yes, in a certain order, it blends > without problems. Maybe that's worth filing a bug report for...? > > (Also, I should add a feature request for multiblend: support deflate > compression ...) > > Thanks! You saved my pano. :) > > Best, > Benjamin > > Monkey wrote: > > Are you wedded to enblend? multiblend would have no such issues, and > actually does blend, not just assemble, disconnected images. > > > > Alternatively, have you tried reordering the images? Rename > testing0002.tif to testing0000.tif and vice versa. > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/42a0bf5e-a868-4e22-86f3-4da731327113%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
