On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 08:41:22AM -0700, T. Modes wrote:
> For scanned images this lens concept is not so good. So you would like to
> optimize the field of view for each individual image.
When I have an A4 scanner and say an A2 sized image, in theory four
scans would cover the whole image, but to get some overlap to allow
hugin to work I'll scan 9 images.
Each of those scans will be precisely 2480*3508 pixels large and cover
a real-life area of 210x297 mm. Why would you need to decouple and
optimize the FOV separately?
Roger.
--
+-- Rogier Wolff -- www.harddisk-recovery.nl -- 0800 220 20 20 --
- Datarecovery Services Nederland B.V. Delft. KVK: 30160549 -
| Files foetsie, bestanden kwijt, alle data weg?!
| Blijf kalm en neem contact op met Harddisk-recovery.nl!
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20190319160147.GL23430%40BitWizard.nl.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
