Thanks. I've made panoramas using GIMP, never with Photoshop.
An option that might work for you is to have Hugin output remapped
images. They'll be appropriately distorted, rotated, positioned as they
would be in a blended panorama. Then you can layer them together in
Photoshop. I think that would give you unblended seams. Simply
flattening the layered image might be sufficient.
I haven't done that in a long time, so I forget if the remapped images
make transparent all parts of a remapped image that aren't included in
the blended panorama. But it might work.
Another option, since you want deliberate mismatches and misalignments,
is to put in mismatched/bad control points. If you don't run the "clean
control points" option, the "bad" control points will survive and affect
the alignment process.
I use Hugin with the Expert user interface, ("Interface > Expert"). If
you usually use the Simple interface or the Assistant tab in the GL
Preview window, you might need to change. The Expert interface gives a
lot more control over the process.
On 11/10/23 04:49, Alexander Drecun wrote:
Mostly with Photoshop or Affinity. I used Hugin and, with a basic
start-to-finish approach, have gotten very nice panoramas too. The
issue I’m having is that I’m deliberately trying to produce
bad/misaligned/unblended panoramas, and this can be difficult to
systematize. Photoshop will produce tiled, unblended results but only
if I overwhelm it to a very specific degree; if I add too many images,
it will freeze and won’t spit anything out. Affinity, meanwhile,
always blends no matter the result it gets. I think Hugin is the best
option is because I can make choices about all of the control points
that decide just how aligned or misaligned my panoramas are. The issue
is that I just need to figure out how to prevent it from trying to
blend the component images into a seamless stitch.
On Nov 9, 2023, at 11:11 PM, David W. Jones <gnomeno...@gmail.com> wrote:
How do you make your panoramas now?
On 11/9/23 20:47, Alexander Drecun wrote:
<Screenshot 2023-11-09 at 10.45.00 PM.png>
<Screenshot 2023-11-09 at 10.46.33 PM.png>
Yeah, a hard cut. I'm aiming for a stitch that is basically the
tiled images layered over one another before any blending or
exposure correction is done. I've attached a screencap from the
preview window and a screencap of what it's looking like once
stitched. (Btw it's intentional that things are misaligned.)
I'll try these entries with Enblend to see if they make a
difference. How do I leave out "photometric optimization?" I'm still
relatively new to Hugin and so some of these things are a bit over
my head.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 6:13 PM David W. Jones <gnomeno...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hmm, so you want hard seams between images - no blending, just a
sharp
cut from one image to the next?
Gunter's reference to the online documentation might have the
solution
in it.
Maybe one option is to set enblend's levels to 1? I think
"--levels=1"
tells enblend tto blend as little as possible between images.
On 11/8/23 20:07, Alexander Drecun wrote:
> Is there any way to stitch a panorama without having Hugin
blend/match
> the exposure across the component images? Specifically, I want
to see
> the seams and edges of each component image in the stitched
panorama.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
--
David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
My password is the last 8 digits of π.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/8417189b-e313-4dd3-9319-837a1125644c%40gmail.com.
