[Moved to hugs-bugs]
> Ok that worked well. Now I am being told that "with" is a reserved word.
> Any idea why/what that is?
> It obviously is not reserved by whatever compiler Malcolm Wallace is
> developing with.
Slap on the wrists for Jeff Lewis and co-conspirators - they added 2
new keywords (see "Implicit parameters" in the "Hugs Extensions"
section of the Hugs manual) but didn't turn them off when you use hugs
+98 (or just hugs since +98 is default). You could turn it off by
recompiling Hugs with the symbol IPARAM undefined (not clear if this
can be done via config or by editing the Makefile or ...). If you
have Microsoft's compiler, you could give this a shot - instructions
on building Hugs are in the Install file at the top of the Hugs source
tree.
A second slap for grabbing a common English word (with). The other
keyword (dlet) will probably not be missed. If there's no
less-intrusive alternative, the (quite disgusting but unavoidable)
hack used to let us us "as", "hiding" and "qualified" as keywords
without making them reserved is probably the thing to do.
Meanwhile, the quick fix is obvious enough:
gcc -xc -E -traditional -Dwith=thisIsNotAReservedWord
A
