#39: Incorrect parsing of lambda expressions
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: Ørjan Johansen | Owner: nobody
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: parsing | Version: 200609
Resolution: | Keywords:
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by Ørjan Johansen):
What, you are right, the argument of a function is an aexp, while lambdas
are exp^10^s. It just seemed so natural that I assumed it was allowed:
for example, without it continuation passing style gets more awkward.
Well, now that I understand why it happens, I see that I can get around it
with a $.
--
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hugs/ticket/39>
Hugs <http://www.haskell.org/hugs/>
Hugs 98, an interpreter for Haskell
_______________________________________________
Hugs-Bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-bugs
