> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:23:21PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > [BTW, your mailer is mangling From: lines] > > > > Thanks for the tip. What's getting mangled? > > When you start a new thread, your From: line is > > > One of your replies to Mark Hills put his address into the From: line.
I am no longer using a standard email program. When I reply to a message, I contstruct the reply by manually editing the message being replied to. I make mistakes when I do that. One of the mistakes I make is forgetting to update the From: address. I'll try to be more careful. > > I'm trying to understand what primitive operators are built into hugs > > that are then used to load the Prelude. (I'm a bottom-up type of person). > > I don't think that a bottom-up approach that goes through Hugs is the > best way to learn Haskell (not that going through a compiler written > in Haskell will be any better). You're better off taking the Haskell > 98 Report as the baseline. That is my plan. I expect to buy copies of the revised report and the Haskell Road to Logic,... book I got through interlibrary loan. The revised report is available online, but I find reading a physical book handy when I want to take a break from the computer. > > > (If you still have that Prelude.hs you copied in the current directory, > > > you should remove it.) > > > > What I still don't understand is why that file being present affects > > the way hugs runs when hugs says it is ignoring the file. > > The explanation is in the above messages of Mark Hills and myself; I > can't think of another way to express it. Basically you put an internal > Hugs module where it wasn't expected. Just don't do that. At some point I am going to fix that problem in my copy of hugs. Dave Feustel _______________________________________________ Hugs-Users mailing list Hugs-Users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-users