Yes, it would be helpful if people kept records but the format would
need sorting first and then a protocol established for levels and
range of freq and freq modulation etc.
It would take people with a technical background to have the ability
to resolve...
hence my comment with J Public...just 'too nebulous'.

Partly why it's not nailed yet !


On Dec 24, 2:46 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
> interesting the cycles. It would be interesting if someone has been
> marking on their calender their perceptions of the noise they hear
> being back on or being
> back off, sort like the way Aux seems to perceive it, and whether
> their is
> any cycles to be found in the switching of it being perceived on or
> off.
>
> On Dec 22, 2:38 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Didn't Aux link this earlier..I meant to comment that the Yahoo Hum
> > group have been talking quite a bit about 9 day cycles- but I didn't
> > get stuck in there as 'all too nebulous' given the state of ability to
> > measure the Hum successfully.
> > I;m always prepared to accept that the sun as the giver of  all life
> > on the planet has a extreme prescience in our existence.
> > Love it , or fear it we still need it!
> > Oh..and our planets defences too Mr Science!
>
> > On Dec 22, 7:25 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Thanks for the link. I would point others to read the whole page and
> > > not just the part about the ringing atmosphere.  Their is other
> > > information
> > > that is pertinent to our situations since it has to do within a radius
> > > starting at
> > > only 5 miles above us.
>
> > >  Interesting story about 6-9 day cycles emerging.  But if
> > > anything I would suspect this is something that helps lead others from
> > > the
> > > truth that what we suffer is actually manmade.  They seem to always be
> > > trying
> > > to throw out some public disclosure that points others at the random
> > > of nature
> > > or natural and pointing us as far as they can from manmade.
>
> > >    What I hear isn't anything random, or I would't be able to perceive
> > > some form
> > > of a relevant pattern that my brain is recognizing.  Nor would others,
> > > on this
> > > group, have the capacity to be recognizing the perception of the
> > > patterns emerging
> > > of the noise of the sound.
>
> > >http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/12/081216-earth-breathes...
>
> > > Starting at about 5 miles (85 kilometers) above Earth's surface, the
> > > thermosphere has been known to experience expansion and contraction
> > > every 27 days, the time it takes the sun to rotate on its axis.
>
> > > But until now few scientists had looked at shorter-term changes in
> > > atmospheric density.
>
> > > Thayer and colleagues found fluctuations in density roughly every
> > > five, seven, or nine days that correspond to changes in geomagnetic
> > > activity, atmospheric composition, and infrared radiation—all signs
> > > that extreme solar weather is at work.
>
> > > The team thinks coronal holes help explain the pattern of the breaths.
>
> > > Ringing Atmosphere
>
> > > David Klumpar, a solar physicist at Montana State University in
> > > Bozeman, said that activity from the sun is constantly and randomly
> > > "tapping" Earth, creating oscillations in the our planet's natural
> > > frequencies like a spoon tapping on a glass of water.
>
> > > "I would imagine that Thayer [and colleagues] are finding some of
> > > those natural frequencies," said Klumpar, who was not involved in the
> > > work.
>
> > > "The atmosphere is ringing, like a water glass when 'tapped' by solar
> > > eruptions."
>
> > > David Hathaway, a solar physicist at NASA's Marshall Space Flight
> > > Center, said that, without having seen the actual data, "I'm a little
> > > surprised."
>
> > > He noted that solar scientists have long known about the 27-day cycles
> > > of geomagnetic activity related to the sun's rotation.
>
> > > "But on a nine-day cycle, I'm not sure what it would be."
>
> > > He added that the last two years would indeed have seen most of the
> > > atmospheric disturbances coming from coronal holes.
>
> > > The real question with the shorter-term bumps noticed by Thayer's team
> > > would be how significant they are above the "noise"—expected and
> > > random variations in atmospheric conditions.
>
> > > On Dec 17, 3:57 pm, "lindaramey" <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > SCROLL DOWN TO RINGING ATMOSPHERE     
> > > > HUMM????http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/12/081216-earth-breathes...quoted
> > > >  text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to