How's the survey going? When I last looked there were 61 replies which isn't bad- What sort of time scale are you looking at to get some results?
On Jun 5, 10:31 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > I have to agree the survey didn't seem very incisive, to pick a word. > Given hum complexity and spread, it would need more in depth questions > to be usefu, imo. > > On Jun 2, 9:54 pm, Jane <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Many thanks for the sensible advice, John. I have looked at the > > questions and agree that some seem completely unconnected to the issue > > of understanding the demographics of 'hum' sufferers? Perhaps the > > person seeking participation would like to explain the basis of the > > questions? > > > On May 31, 6:10 am, John Dawes <[email protected]> wrote: > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
