You don’t have the math to back up YOUR statements? I do.

You have my paper, you have the emissions, and you have my math.

A Faraday Cage stops frequencies that are bigger in amplitude than the
holes in the mesh. A Gaussian Screen, of the correct thickness as
required by the energy level evident stops everything, but it has to
be envelopment. UHF travels up to 50 miles as a USEABLE SIGNAL, UHF
(theoretically) travels infinitely as ENERGY.

Insofar as underground goes – Yep, you’re right – Archeologists don’t
locate that which they are searching for using Infrasound up to 300
feet deep. You’re making statements regarding something and you don’t
know the technology.

If you’re going to shoot me down every time I PROVE something use
proof to back up YOUR claims.

I have SPECTRUM ANALYSIS scans from all over the world – They
correlate exactly, that’s EXACTLY there.

Electricity is the same UNIVERSALLY, not just planet-wide. It has the
same PHYSICAL properties EVERYWHERE. It doesn’t change simply because
you travel to a pub in Scotland from a pub in Australia and then to a
bar in the USA. Electricity stays the same, only the beer changes.
Coincidence my ass. Get a telescope and look at the stars at night,
every one of them has THE SAME electrical charges as our Solar System
– ALL OF THEM.

I have 900 Megabytes of data. From every country on Earth where BPL is
operational. As it states in my research reports, if you want further
data all you have to do is ask. There are 100’s of links to further
evidential PROOF in the REFERENCES SECTION of my first paper – Smart
Grid An Explanation – Have you looked at even one of them? Probably
not. I did, every one.

Do you know WHO makes this equipment? Where? Who holds the patents?
Who markets it? What its physical properties are? Where it is
physically mounted on the grid?  Signal strength and Protocols?  Do
you even know what harmonics are? They are marginally explained in my
last post, but do you understand it? Do you understand Fourier Series
and why they are not applicable in this case? Do you understand why
Hartley Transforms are used instead? Probably not.

Tell you what – There are satellites in geo-synchronous orbit with TX/
RX 24/7. There are satellites in constant-daylight orbit doing the
same thing. There are even more satellites in orbit that are not
synchronous anything but one lot has an equatorial orbit, the other
polar. 24/7 their signals can be picked up anywhere and everywhere on
the planet, yep, even underground or in a Faraday Cage. According to
your way of thinking none of them or their electrical/electronic
signals exist because YOU can’t see them.

When you make statements, make sure that you know what you are talking
about AND have the data to back up your statements. Don’t shoot me
down because you are lost in the depth of the technology. That’s why
nobody has ever solved this “thing” before; it’s out of most people’s
league, never mind their depth.

I am rational AND logical, you are not. You state arguments without
any evidence to prove your case. I, on the other hand, keep my mouth
firmly shut until I have proof.

Three times I have posted that anyone that wants the research papers –
Just ask. How many actually asked? 2. Josh puts forth an argument
based on no facts whatsoever.

Engineering/Physics proof is the ability to be able to REPLICATE
findings ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE. The research data HAS BEEN
replicated anywhere and everywhere – On Earth at any rate.

And Trev, think of something else to use as an example – Faraday and
underground are wearing a bit thin.


On Apr 15, 1:11 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would say , however persuasive and in depth your work Vic  whilst
> appreciated by many, the Hum can still be heard underground and also in
> Faraday cages.
> I think elsewhere it's been commented that Faraday cages do not block UHF
> but the ELF component of your harmonics would be generated close to the
> power lines and I can't see spurious UHF traveling  cross country to
> permeate a Faraday cage  and build up  subharmonics to the same degree as
> done locally, at source.
> OK- I don't have the maths to clarify this, but neither do you have the
> local conditions other than your studies, elsewhere in the world.
> particularly in specific cases as mentioned here.
> I'm not saying you are wrong in your proposals on raw principles , just
> that the dispersal of harmonic energy can't be proven, and further- can't
> be assumed to apply everywhere where the local conditions are unknown.
> ie: Co-incidence is not causality- and you  can't even argue co-incidence,
> without backup data.
> Yes, it takes courage to take 'them on' -but rationality must still play
> its part.
>
>
>
> On Friday, 13 April 2012 05:08:24 UTC+1, Vic wrote:
>
> > Another young guy dropped dead tonight on a sports field near London,
> > UK. He was 22 years old.
>
> > I sent both of my documents to his parents and to the sports club.
>
> > Anyone in the UK send anything? I doubt it.
>
> > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing
> > anything?
>
> > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over
> > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going
> > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into
> > their litigation too.
>
> > C'mon everybody.
> On Friday, 13 April 2012 05:08:24 UTC+1, Vic wrote:
>
> > Another young guy dropped dead tonight on a sports field near London,
> > UK. He was 22 years old.
>
> > I sent both of my documents to his parents and to the sports club.
>
> > Anyone in the UK send anything? I doubt it.
>
> > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing
> > anything?
>
> > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over
> > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going
> > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into
> > their litigation too.
>
> > C'mon everybody.
> On Friday, 13 April 2012 05:08:24 UTC+1, Vic wrote:
>
> > Another young guy dropped dead tonight on a sports field near London,
> > UK. He was 22 years old.
>
> > I sent both of my documents to his parents and to the sports club.
>
> > Anyone in the UK send anything? I doubt it.
>
> > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing
> > anything?
>
> > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over
> > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going
> > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into
> > their litigation too.
>
> > C'mon everybody.
> On Friday, 13 April 2012 05:08:24 UTC+1, Vic wrote:
>
> > Another young guy dropped dead tonight on a sports field near London,
> > UK. He was 22 years old.
>
> > I sent both of my documents to his parents and to the sports club.
>
> > Anyone in the UK send anything? I doubt it.
>
> > The information is there to kill this "thing". Why isn't anyone doing
> > anything?
>
> > There are a lot of groups of people taking out legal complaints over
> > in the States now that they know what "it" is. Others who were going
> > after stopping the so-called "smart" meters have swung BPL info into
> > their litigation too.
>
> > C'mon everybody.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.

Reply via email to