To answer your questions as they appear: 1) Really, really complicated stuff. 2) Yep, one is about 12 grand, 3 are close to $2000 each. Then you'll need a MS TechNet subscription - about 2 grand. MS let you set up your own Cloud DB in the subscription cost. 3) Nope 4) Nope That's all of the questions you asked answered. Why don't you ask me for the research documents that took over 2 years to complete? If you read them, take the time to understand what this "thing" is, and then look at the listed reference material, you might know what you can and can't do. On the other hand, after you've read and understood the research you'll find that you don't have to do ANY yourself. It's all been done for you; as I've stated numerous times on numerous posts. Nobody has cracked this :"thing" before, and some very smart people have tried. I do not consiider myself THAT smart, just know this stuff and am indeffatigable (or so I've been told) If you read the docs, you might better understand whether you can crack it or whether, in fact, you need to - Why reinvent the wheel Josh? Right now, I'm past the research stage on this "thing" - I'm going to get the USA to invade Canada. Just kidding! ........... Maybe :P
On Sunday, April 22, 2012 10:34:42 PM UTC-4, josh wrote: > Hi Vic, > > What sort of instrumentation is used for the recordings? Expensive? > Straight forward to use? > > I've wanted to buy a decent microphone to record low frequency, but from > what I'm gathering, it's not a pressure wave, so would a microphone would > be useless? > > Thanks > > Josh > > > On 23/04/2012, at 5:43 AM, Vic wrote: > > I've just switched to "the new Google groups" page - You can attach files > here! YAAAAY! > > Today (Sunday) O'Brien and Murdoch allowed their Editor in Cheif of the > Irish Times to run a misleading article on the (since May 2011) Beaufort > Hum. > > The 4th column - Discordant Note - States thar 1 in 5 (20%) of people hear > it and that it is the note of Eb (Eflat). It's actually Eb2 or F#2 at the > frequency of 90.98Hz which is 27-32 cents away from the actual note. It's > also not the note that people are hearing but the ELECTRICAL POWER > SUBHARMONIC of that (almost) note. And as these 1 in 5 hear in the C-range, > guess what it sounds like? A deisel engine. Whooda thought?! > > OCTAVE HARMONICS and ELECTRICAL POWER HARNMONICS are not the same. It > misleads to quote one in terms of the other because the operand differs. > Plus the sound you hear is NOT the frequnecy that is picked up by > instrumentation. The sound that YOU hear is the remnant of the COLLISION of > sine waves. > > I've attached the article AND a Power Scan showing the 90.98Hz > INTERHARMONIC right here in Pittsburgh today. > > Same everywhere - And it would be, it's a global communication system that > "they" are denying exists. > > That'll do for today - I've been advised to cut people some slack because > they are not "getting it". > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hum Sufferers" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/hum-sufferers/-/bKj4jIk-DS4J. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en. > <beaufort.jpg><90point87 Interharmonic.png> > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/hum-sufferers/-/AgMQGLp1jzAJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
