What was the input /measurement source, John? Was the base line of 100 meaningful? They do look random, true -and a lot more variable than I detect, local to me.
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 08:36:00 UTC+1, john dawes wrote: > > For the past 22 days I have measured the relative Hum level at 6 hour > intervals to see if there is any pattern to the variation in Hum level. > > I have posted a graph of the results which appear to be random. > > Although only a small sample, there appears to be no daily cycle and no > connection with atmospheric surface pressure. > > The readings were made in Bristol UK from 22/5/2012 to 12/6/2012 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/hum-sufferers/-/bIldjZmdL74J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
