Lidia- I never agreed in Vics' analysis, totally. We had a few spats over it and he was pretty angry anyway not wanting to mince words overmuch. I did feel he had a special situation where he was with new power lines and upgrading going on at once in an isolated region so he could be more selective than us in the 'EM soup'. My main memory from then was Smart Grid bad- Hum, different. mainly as all the recordings associated with SG have high harmonics which are easily picked up and second order effects would be lost below this. I know, frustratingly, that this is what lets perpetuators of EM pollution off the hook but it not proof to assume connections across the spectrum. Thanks for SG info- will look later. I feel you're more in Vic's territory with your situation and need to fight that on merit, locally. Maybe you could film your toy car to get attention for more scientific tests? Trev
On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 23:58:07 UTC, Lidia wrote: > > Trev, I bet I am rather on a right path, it's all about what Victor has > already written about the Smart Grid and the Hum - the 40 MHz RC car > reacting when the Hum is ON is just a sheer proof. I will make the same > experiment on a few other locations, but I am pretty sure that the results > will be the same everywhere. (Tonight it started again just after 22:30, > the car does not need a radio controller to move, and it gets transformed > into a racing car!) > I attach a very "cute" leaflet which explains the Smart Grid technology- > there is the Mesh network within which falls the 40 MHz channel bandwidth. > Victor has explained very well how this technology creates the infrasonic > and low frequency sound we all know as the Hum. RF leaks are just the > "dressing" on the low frequency components salad we all have to eat, helas. > > Take care, > Lidia > > 10 декември 2013, вторник, 12:53:31 UTC, Trev написа: >> >> Sounds like you really are in a #'1 'Hot Spot', Lidia! >> I think from past work it's been established that high freqs follow the >> skin effect [like lightning round a plane skin] and though they may pick up >> on wiring would not be able to drive into such a low RF impedance and cause >> re-radiation. Would act more like screen- but infrasound is a different >> matter entirely and more likely to cause visual and visceral effects. But >> it is banned as a danger to health and not picked up when tested for [as >> far as I know] in the general community. >> It does sound like you have a good case to get some testing done by your >> local authority health protection people. >> >> On Thursday, 5 December 2013 01:59:45 UTC, Lidia wrote: >>> >>> My Hum has been also "masked" by a HF "tinnitus" during in the day, >>> which at night gets so strong that I equally despise it as the Hum, and I >>> have enough reasons to believe that it is caused by the Hum and is yet >>> another ugly face of the Hum....(The louder the Hum, the louder the >>> tinnitus.) It is nothing more than the RF irradiated from the power lines >>> and the smart grid system, possibly combined with WiMax and other antennas. >>> The same "static hissing, rotating, white/ Brownian noise" can be heard on >>> any digital recorder camcorder, where there is a Hum. We've been slowly >>> cooked at a very low intensity pulsed RF/microwave frequency. The >>> vibrations felt in the body by many of the Hum victims, are a living >>> evidence of how a microwave oven works - by exciting the food water >>> molecules and redirecting the heat. And right now I have vibrations in my >>> heart, as Victor said, it hits me in the gut and chest! >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
