The Real Slumdog Story: India's Ghastly Commonwealth
Cleanup<http://dreamactivist.blogspot.com/2010/03/india-govts-ghastly-commonwealth.html>

I'm deeply troubled. Very deeply troubled.

An inconspicuous report in British paper Independent shows how the Delhi
administration in India is sweeping up hundreds of thousands of poorest of
the poor -- men, women and children -- from the city's streets and jailing
them randomly. I heard they are doing it because of the upcoming
Commonwealth Games in October when sports personalities, politicians,
dignitaries and most importantly, corporate businesses will come to our
once-colonized land and spend their royal time and money to celebrate
another round of the so-called global fraternity. Oh yes, some of them will
run, jump and play ball too.

And Indian middle class will cheer.

So, in order to make the city look clean, the streets beggar-free, and the
country wear a First World image, Delhi and India governments have taken on
an urgent mission, with a religious zeal, to pick up the countless, hapless,
half-naked, starving Indians -- men, women and children -- and are
indefinitely putting them in India's dreaded jails before they're shipped
out to somewhere across the country. What will happen to these God-forsaken
millions and their lives, livelihoods, social connections and dignities? I'm
sure they'll let us know when the celebrities and business houses check out
after the Games. Normally, in India, middle class don't query on social
connections or education of street children.

We've seen such grotesque acts of violence in India many times over the
past, particularly since India graduated from its mediocre non-alignment,
"socialist" days to a glitzy-globalized "democracy" days. We've seen
numerous, bloody communal riots, barbaric genocide of the poor in the name
of religion and caste, and international terrorism. We've also seen a
massive change of government with transition of power from a so-called right
wing dark force to a so-called centrist liberal enlightened. The new leaders
of India are not the zealots and bigots, but internationally known
economists and academics, United Nations celebrities, and of course, the
Gandhi Dynasty -- I'm sure they have certain qualifications too.

In 2002, when a barbaric carnage took place in Gandhi's state of Gujarat
when thousands of poor Muslims were slaughtered by a bigoted chief minister
and his bigoted administration, there was international uproar: the New York
Times, BBC, CNN, PBS, NPR and all other big-name media organizations gave us
the ignorant a thorough coverage and insider information on the ghastly
violence. In 2008, when a group of Pakistan-based terrorists snuck in to the
five-star Taj International in the Indian Wall Street city of Mumbai and
killed hundreds of hotel residents, there was another series of media
uproar; CNN provided unprecedented, round-the-clock, "ticker-tape" coverage
of the terrorism. We were delighted to see the extent of responsibility
corporate media displaying to unearth major events happening on the other
side of the world.

I'll make it short. This time around, however, when another major act of
violence is happening in the capital of West-blessed India, I see no outrage
-- barring a few small news blips here and there -- either by the mighty
human rights groups and their liberal followers, or by the mighty media that
spent so much of their precious time and money to uncover Gujarat or Mumbai.
I'm sad and disappointed, but not truly surprised.

The liberal outrage -- either of the international rights and justice groups
or of corporate media -- is selective, and media keeps manufacturing
peoples' consent for or against a social, political or economic event. If
the Gujarat (or the 1992 Babri Mosque) carnage is ghastly (and they are),
then the Delhi clean-up of the begging destitute is equally grotesque. In
the former, poor people die immediately; in the latter, poor people die a
slow but sure death because of police torture, forced displacement,
starvation, hunger, poverty and depression. In case of the latter, women and
children suffer the most. In both cases, the brutality leaves lifelong,
negative impacts on the surviving children who'd spare no time to act back
against the repressive system with their own acts of violence.

I hope ordinary people both in India and the West (and perhaps some
conscientious media people) pick up on this new fascism of the India
government, and force them to stop this state-sponsored violence and
brutality.

Again, I'm deeply troubled -- to see the inaction and lack of outrage,
especially of the elite liberal that screamed their lungs off before. You
can't have a double standard to denounce hate.

Thank you for reading my quickly drafted note.

Partha Banerjee
Brooklyn, New York
March 14, 2010

<http://dreamactivist.blogspot.com/>
http://dreamactivist.blogspot.com/
-- 
Adv Kamayani Bali Mahabal
+919820749204
skype-lawyercumactivist

"After a war, the silencing of arms is not enough. Peace means respecting
all rights. You can’t respect one of them and violate the others. When a
society doesn’t respect the rights of its citizens, it undermines peace and
leads it back to war.”
-- Maria Julia Hernandez


www.otherindia.org
www.binayaksen.net
www.phm-india.org
www.phmovement.org
www.ifhhro.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to humanrights-movem...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
humanrights-movement+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to